Reseach Summaries

Cortland , A (2005 . Paying for friends . Rutgers University : Daily TargumSummaryThe word written by Cortland (2005 ) asserts that there is an implicit misconception that Greek liveness at Rutgers University is only if slightly fun and on-value adding activities much(prenominal) as partying and getting beatify . However the antecedent suggests that there is more to sodality or sorority rank and file that meets the eye . She make outs that these groups give a substantial king to charitable commences for instance , they sponsor the conduct of Derby enormous time which has a charitable organization as benefactive role . The author further argues that there is as well as little truth in the belief that connector fraternities and sororities would cause the scholarly person to be defocused in academic life . On the cont rary , he whitethorn even be more motivated to study since they ar provided with locales to do so such as study groups . The article speaks to students as sense of hearing , as an attempt to debunk the known notion that joining fraternities and sororities will not be beneficial to the student , and whitethorn even be harmful to them . The principal(a) thesis of the objet dart is that fraternities and sororities may do much upright for the student . It accords him with the opportunity to tenderize with fellow students , foster an glory of social certificate of liability , allow him to build strong ties inwardly the br opposite /sisterhood , and possibly give him the chance to fulfill a leadership post . The author wants to expound on the benefits of rank to these groups , in contrast with the more popular prejudicious beliefsRhetorical CommentaryCortland (2005 ) begins the put in very casually , with the belief that joining fraternities and sororities pack reperc ussions such as it being too expensive , od! dment up in academic failure , and occupying oneself with non-value adding activities . She then capitalizes on the fear and begins to factually show the benefits of membership . She cites specific examples to modify credence to his points . For example , on engaging themselves in a worthy activity , she cites Derby Days .

Moreover , she in both case gives a specific percentage of 2 as a proportion of student s expenses spent on membership fees . These facts ask the piece believable and compelling . The piece to a fault takings smoothly , with Cortland (2005 not sounding biased about her arguments to the pro-side of fr aternity /sorority membership . She presents the facts as they be convincing the lector as he reads along the pieceUtility in My ArgumentThe current piece obviously lends support to the commanding aspects of fraternity or sorority membership . It may be used to pursue the idea that this has positive outcomes for the student . First , these groups accord the student with a venue for socialising and building camaraderie with fellow students . In attachment , these groups are also engaged in corporate social responsibility / philanthropic projects . The student may also modernise a passion for excellence , with group initiatives geared towards this farce . It also may be used to strongly argue that these groups are conducive to developing leadership potential , citing the estimate of presidents and other high-pro leaders who...If you want to get a unspoiled essay, align it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper