From A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective Provide A Short Critique Of Two (2) Of The Following Four Theoretical Frameworks: Functionalism, Rational Choice Theory, Positivism And/or Behaviorism

A Comparison of symbolic Interactionism , Functionalism and sane Choice TheorySymbolic primeval interactionism stipulates that mint act toward things base on the means those things agree for them and these meanings argon derived from well-disposed interaction and modified through reading material (Griffin 1997 ) This take aim of thought in sociology delves business officeicularly on the micro-level analysis of piece interaction in golf-club and delves to a greater extent on how raft translate meaning from the different interactions that they endure with opposite man macrocosms and the various structures in rateliness . This is in contrast with the hitch of behaviorism that worldly concern merely resolve to a accustomed set of stimuli and hence act further in such a way dictated by his nature . Symbolic inter actionism delves to a greater extent on the creative powers of humans rather than on their supine role in establishing meaning (Blumer 1962This special motion is somewhat in contrast with the separate major schools on sociological thought , namely Functionalism , sensible Theory and divergence theory , to name some of the much prominent unmatcheds . employ symbolic interactionism as a vantage point , bingle may hence evaluate the shortcomings of other schools of thought , narrate , in this guinea pig Functionalism and Rational TheoryFunctionalism delves more on the large level and treats agents as passive recipients of various social stimuli . Functionalism entails that society works much give care an being whither homeostasis is the norm and that they primaeval to change is a slow change in one deduct , slowly banquet to the many a(prenominal) other co-ordinated constituents establishing new connections , so to speak , in society as a livelong - a campaign g eared more towards a balance between the man! y aspects of social interaction . For instance , one might require at society as an organism and that each part serves to sustain the whole organism .

Each part of that organism is an essential part and a drastic change in one of the move is felt by society as a wholeConsider for instance the role of the disposal , military , securities industry , and the various improvement sectors . We may liken society as an organism , with the government being the head , the military being the white occupation cells that protect the body from foreign organisms , and the merchandise and the service sectors , as foods and h ands and /or feet . We may regain that in this particular perspective , every facet of social reality is crucial and that institutions determine how and why agents act and interactRational select theory , on the other hand , focuses more on the logicality of actions and institutions in society . This is more akin to functionalism in many value as it delves more with the necessity of certain(a) acts and responses as stepping stones towards symmetricalness . A key concept here is that rational choice theory asserts that humans make purpose whether individually or collectively based on rational choices However , an ready shortcoming of this perspective is that it assumes that rationality is the norm and that interactions are based on rational choices . Basic psychological science , however , would itemise us that most of our choices spring more form inclinations...If you urgency to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustom Paper.com

If you want to get a full essa! y, visit our page: write my paper